According to @lookonchain, the Aster buyback wallet burned 77.86 million ASTER valued at 79.81 million USD about one hour ago. Source: twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1996748962846658885 The wallet address 0x02DCd5b2DdE0F6edb4B797DA468fBc52F23f49Dc shows the related transaction on Arkham Intelligence, confirming the reported amount and timing. Source: intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x02DCd5b2DdE0F6edb4B797DA468fBc52F23f49Dc Token burns permanently reduce circulating supply, a factor traders track for liquidity and volatility around ASTER markets. Source: binance.com/en/academy/articles/what-is-a-coin-burn

According to @PeckShieldAlert, approximately $2.4 million was recovered by burning the hacker’s $pxETH, with the same amount minted back to the Redacted Cartel multisig on Dec 1, 2025, source: @PeckShieldAlert. The burn removes attacker-held pxETH from circulation while the remint consolidates the recovered amount under the Redacted Cartel multisig for custody, source: @PeckShieldAlert. Traders can monitor the Redacted Cartel multisig for subsequent on-chain transfers related to pxETH to gauge post-recovery flows, source: @PeckShieldAlert.

According to @cas_abbe, Aster DEX posted 30-day perps volume of $258 billion, 30-day DEX volume of $3.58 billion, and $54 million in fees, with $ASTER buybacks totaling 41 million over the period. Source: @cas_abbe on X, Nov 30, 2025. According to @cas_abbe, Aster plans to continue buybacks alongside a token burn, which the author highlights as a supply-side catalyst relevant for $ASTER liquidity and trading. Source: @cas_abbe on X, Nov 30, 2025. According to @cas_abbe, the Binance Blockchain event next month is a watchlist catalyst for possible $ASTER-related updates. Source: @cas_abbe on X, Nov 30, 2025.

According to Lookonchain, wallet 0xb13a minted 1,000,000,000 PORT3 and sold 162,750,000 PORT3 for 199.56 BNB (about $166,000). Source: Lookonchain (X, Nov 23, 2025). Before the selling was completed, the PORT3 team pulled liquidity and multiple exchanges paused PORT3 deposits. Source: Lookonchain (X, Nov 23, 2025). The attacker then burned the remaining 837,250,000 PORT3; the referenced wallet is 0xb13a503da5f368e48577c87b5d5aec73d08f812e. Source: Lookonchain (X, Nov 23, 2025).

According to @OnchainLens, the PORT3 exploiter burned the remaining 837.25 million PORT3 tokens valued at $6.76 million on Nov 22, 2025, based on Nansen on-chain data. Per Nansen data cited by @OnchainLens, this action eliminates that wallet’s immediate sell supply and removes exploiter-held tokens from circulation. According to Nansen, traders can monitor PORT3 spot and DEX liquidity, exchange deposit alerts, and related on-chain flows via Nansen analytics to assess post-burn liquidity and volatility. Using figures shared by @OnchainLens and Nansen, the reported values imply an approximate reference price of about $0.0081 per PORT3 at the time of the burn.

According to @cas_abbe, $ASTER has printed higher highs and higher lows this month while the broader market fell, signaling relative strength for traders to note, source: @cas_abbe on X, Nov 22, 2025. The author attributes this resilience to buybacks, stating Aster DEX purchased nearly 40M ASTER in November and plans to burn about half of those tokens, source: @cas_abbe on X, Nov 22, 2025. The author reports that buybacks have now stopped and are scheduled to resume on December 10, removing a near-term source of demand and raising the risk of a corrective move if market momentum weakens, source: @cas_abbe on X, Nov 22, 2025. The author also states Aster is generating 2.5M-3M dollars in daily fees, which they cite as funding for the next buyback wave and a potential upside catalyst, and they frame any dips before buybacks resume as buying opportunities, source: @cas_abbe on X, Nov 22, 2025.

According to @CoinMarketCap, UNI initially jumped 43% to 10.05 after Uniswap proposed a fee switch that routes protocol fees to UNI burns, source: @CoinMarketCap on X. The proposal includes a retroactive burn of 100 million UNI, equal to 10% of the treasury from the beginning, source: @CoinMarketCap on X. For V2, liquidity providers receive 0.25% while a 0.05% protocol fee is directed to UNI burn, source: @CoinMarketCap on X. For V3, 0.01% and 0.05% fee tiers send one quarter of LP fees to UNI burn, while 0.30% and 1% tiers send one sixth of LP fees, source: @CoinMarketCap on X. It also allocates 100% of Unichain sequencer fees to burn, estimated at about 7.5 million dollars annualized before L1 data costs and a 15% share to Optimism, and includes aggregator hook fees for V4 pools, source: @CoinMarketCap on X. A Protocol Fee Discount Auction lets bidders win time-limited zero-fee swaps with the winning bid burned and is estimated to raise LP returns by about 0.06 to 0.26 dollars per 10,000 dollars traded, source: @CoinMarketCap on X. Other items include zero fees for frontend, wallet, and API, and a 2% UNI allocation of 20 million vested quarterly to fund protocol growth, source: @CoinMarketCap on X.

According to @justinsuntron, he posted the message 'Talk less. Burn more!' on Nov 11, 2025 and linked to a DeFi_JUST post, without specifying any asset, burn amount, or timeline (source: twitter.com/justinsuntron/status/1988212979716997421; source: x.com/DeFi_JUST/status/1988143404518179307). For trading, the absence of details means there is no verifiable supply change to price in yet; monitor the same X handles for follow-up announcements that name the asset, quantify the burn, and provide a schedule before positioning (source: twitter.com/justinsuntron/status/1988212979716997421; source: x.com/DeFi_JUST/status/1988143404518179307).

According to @CoinMarketCap, a Nov 11, 2025 post asked Buyback and Burn Meta?, highlighting market attention on token buyback-and-burn mechanisms (source: CoinMarketCap on X, Nov 11, 2025). Token buyback-and-burn typically involves a project repurchasing tokens and sending them to an irrecoverable burn address to reduce circulating supply, a structural factor traders can quantify (source: Binance Academy, What Is a Token Burn?). BNB implements an Auto-Burn that permanently removes BNB each quarter using a disclosed formula tied to on-chain data and price, with transactions recorded on-chain for verification (source: Binance.com, BNB Auto-Burn methodology and quarterly burn announcements). ETH burns base fees under EIP-1559, making net supply changes observable via public metrics that traders track for issuance dynamics (source: Ethereum.org, EIP-1559 fee market change). For trading execution, prioritize issuer announcements, published buyback schedules, and on-chain burn transaction hashes to measure realized supply contraction and timing rather than inferring price direction without data (source: Binance BNB quarterly burn reports; Ethereum.org EIP-1559 references).

According to the source, the Uniswap Foundation announced a governance proposal to activate Uniswap protocol fees and implement UNI token burns, while restructuring the ecosystem under a unified development model led by Uniswap Labs, source: Uniswap Foundation governance announcement. For traders, protocol fees establish on-chain revenue and token burns reduce circulating UNI, making governance voting and rollout milestones key catalysts to monitor for UNI price, liquidity, and funding dynamics, source: Uniswap Foundation governance announcement.

According to @ki_young_ju, Uniswap (UNI) could go parabolic if the protocol fee switch is activated, citing roughly $1T in year-to-date volume for v2 and v3 and estimating about $500M in annual burns if volume holds (source: @ki_young_ju on X, Nov 11, 2025). He adds that exchanges hold about $830M worth of UNI, implying a potential supply shock even with unlocks if the burn mechanism turns on (source: @ki_young_ju on X, Nov 11, 2025).

According to Onchain Lens, Uniswap Labs and the Uniswap Foundation proposed a UNIfication plan to activate protocol fees and burn UNI, drawing notable whale accumulation, source: Onchain Lens; data: Nansen. Three whales purchased a combined 635,680 UNI for approximately $5.56M at execution prices between $8.27 and $8.97, implying a volume-weighted average near $8.75, source: Onchain Lens; data: Nansen. Whale 0xb1f bought 254,441 UNI for $2.28M in USDT at $8.97, whale 0x0f1 bought 199,818 UNI for 504 ETH valued around $1.78M at $8.92, and whale 0x555 bought 181,421 UNI for $1.50M in USDC at $8.27, source: Onchain Lens; data: Nansen. The reported addresses are 0xb1f4f8edfbe7f41371d3b9b520da14c4927fd16d, 0x0f11d9df629d99095b772d57ae4478ba528f968a, and 0x555187752ef6d73758862b5d364aab362c996d0e, providing concrete on-chain references for tracking cost basis and liquidity bands near $8.27–$8.97, source: Onchain Lens; data: Nansen.

According to @lookonchain, the sun.io team bought back and burned another 2.06M SUN worth about $45,000, reported on Nov 4, 2025 (source: @lookonchain on X). Since Dec 15, 2021, cumulative buybacks and burns total 648.54M SUN valued at about $13.86M (source: @lookonchain on X). The post includes an Arkham Intel explorer address for verification, allowing traders to monitor ongoing burn activity on-chain (source: @lookonchain; Arkham Intel). Based on @lookonchain’s figures, the latest tranche equals roughly 0.32% of the total reported SUN burned to date, a useful gauge of program cadence for trade planning (source: @lookonchain).

According to @PANewsCN, the Jupiter community has opened a DAO vote on whether to burn approximately 130 million JUP that were previously repurchased via the Litterbox trust, representing about 4 percent of circulating supply. Source: PANews on X, Oct 31, 2025; JupiterExchange on X, Oct 31, 2025. Jupiter stated that this Litterbox burn vote follows a downsizing of the DAO and a community reset, aiming to refocus the ecosystem around JUP and rebuild long-term confidence and consensus. Source: JupiterExchange on X, Oct 31, 2025; PANews on X, Oct 31, 2025. Currently, 50 percent of on-chain revenue is directed to the Litterbox trust fund, which has been buying back JUP from the open market and has accumulated around 130 million tokens intended for DAO use in three years, but holders raised uncertainty concerns. Source: PANews on X, Oct 31, 2025; JupiterExchange on X, Oct 31, 2025. The DAO vote on whether to destroy the existing Litterbox-held JUP started today and is scheduled to end in about 4 days and 13 hours from the announcement. Source: PANews on X, Oct 31, 2025; JupiterExchange on X, Oct 31, 2025. Jupiter added that a separate vote will be held in the coming weeks to decide how to handle the ongoing revenue inflows into the Litterbox. Source: PANews on X, Oct 31, 2025; JupiterExchange on X, Oct 31, 2025. If approved, the burn would remove about 130 million JUP, or roughly 4 percent of circulating supply, constituting a material tokenomics change relevant for trading and liquidity planning. Source: PANews on X, Oct 31, 2025; JupiterExchange on X, Oct 31, 2025.

According to @jp_mullin888, the project is nearing 600M dead ERC20 $OM tokens. Source: @jp_mullin888 on X, Oct 29, 2025. According to @jp_mullin888, Bybit, KuCoin, Bitpanda, HTX, Crypto.com, and Indodax were publicly called on to help push the tally over the 600M mark. Source: @jp_mullin888 on X, Oct 29, 2025. According to @jp_mullin888, this milestone request to major venues puts attention on OM supply tracking and potential venue support that traders monitor. Source: @jp_mullin888 on X, Oct 29, 2025.

According to @ranyi1115, Orderly One completed its first month with over 1,500 DEXs created, 76 graduated into revenue-earning exchanges, and more than $10B in cumulative trading volume, highlighting rapid ecosystem traction. Source: @ranyi1115 on X. The team reports an average of 50 new DEX launches per day and 2.5 daily graduations, indicating a fast conversion from creation to monetized exchanges that traders can track as an activity gauge. Source: @ranyi1115 on X. All graduation fees are burned in ORDER, implying supply reduction as more DEXs graduate, making burn events and graduation counts key tokenomics metrics for ORDER-focused trading strategies. Source: @ranyi1115 on X; @OrderlyNetwork on X.

According to @justinsuntron, a 5.66% reduction in total supply was announced with a reference link directing to a JUST DeFi update for further details, signaling a notable supply-side change relevant to market participants (source: @justinsuntron on X). The announcement post did not specify the affected asset, ticker, burn address, or transaction hash, meaning the exact token involved is not identified within the post itself at the time of the statement (source: @justinsuntron on X).

According to @justinsuntron, he announced "profit burn, user airdrop" in an X post on Oct 15, 2025 (source: @justinsuntron on X). The post did not specify the asset involved, amounts, timing, eligibility, or mechanism, and it only linked to an external post by @0xMayyy (source: @justinsuntron on X). With no parameters disclosed, any price or supply impact cannot be quantified at this time (source: @justinsuntron on X).

According to @adriannewman21, launching a new xxxstr can jeopardize existing NFT tokens, making holder alignment a critical risk factor for traders to watch, source: @adriannewman21, Twitter, Oct 4, 2025, https://twitter.com/adriannewman21/status/1974287354002354689. He advises either creating a clear linkage between the new xxxstr and the existing NFT token or internalizing a fee to sell at 1.2x followed by a token burn within the NFT token, source: @adriannewman21, Twitter, Oct 4, 2025, https://twitter.com/adriannewman21/status/1974287354002354689. For trading decisions, assess upcoming NFT-related token launches for explicit linkage or a fee-sell-1.2x-burn mechanism to gauge dilution and incentive alignment risk highlighted by @adriannewman21, source: @adriannewman21, Twitter, Oct 4, 2025, https://twitter.com/adriannewman21/status/1974287354002354689.

According to @lookonchain, WLFI repurchased 6.04M WLFI using $1.06M in collected fees across Solana, BSC, and Ethereum, then burned 7.89M WLFI on BSC and Ethereum, with 3.06M WLFI remaining unburned on Solana, source: @lookonchain. The team collected 4.91M WLFI (valued at $1.01M) plus $1.06M in fees before executing the $1.06M buyback for 6.04M WLFI, source: @lookonchain. The implied average buy price was approximately $0.176 per WLFI (1.06M/6.04M), while the burned tranche was valued at roughly $0.181 per WLFI (1.43M/7.89M), source: @lookonchain. Net supply contraction equals the 7.89M WLFI burned, while 3.06M WLFI remains on Solana pending any future action, source: @lookonchain. On-chain references were provided via Arkham Intel explorer addresses by @lookonchain, source: @lookonchain.